ReviewCureus2024
Indirect Fistula: A New Terminology for Cerebrospinal Fluid Fistula With Different 'Apparent Origin' and 'Real Origin'.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fistulas are abnormal communications between body cavities. They can occur between the CNS and the extracranial space, presenting clinically as CSF leaks. Due to the variety of features, multiple classifications have been implemented to better study this pathology. A systematic review was conducted using the Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science databases. Observational studies such as cohort studies, case reports, case series, cross-sectional studies, systematic reviews, and publications that assess the classification of CSF leaks were included. The systematic review identified 29 publications that met the required criteria for inclusion. Although the primary focus of most of these publications was not on classification, they briefly mentioned it. The included publications describe classifications according to etiology, exiting flow pressure, anatomic site, and some new classification proposals. Of the 29 included studies, 11 referred to the appearance of CSF rhinorrhea or otorrhea with no relationship between the cause or site of origin and the site of the CSF leak. However, none of these publications names this situation. These results clearly indicate that a term for this circumstance needs to be established; none of the previously listed publications provide a name for this condition. This systematic review aims to demonstrate the necessity of implementing a new term to describe CSF leaks where the 'apparent origin' does not correspond to the 'real origin.' The results show no existing term that considers such cases; therefore, we propose the term 'Indirect Fistula' to designate these cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.