ArticleCureus2024
A Retrospective Study Comparing the Surgical Results of Platysma Myocutaneous Flap, Buccal Pad of Fat, and Nasolabial Flap for Reconstruction After Fibrotomy in Cases of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of nasolabial flap (NLF), a buccal pad of fat flap (BFP), and platysma myocutaneous flap (PMF) for reconstruction following fibrotomy for individuals with oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF). MATERIAL AND
methodA retrospective study was conducted among patients diagnosed with grade III and IV OSMF in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Sharad Pawar Dental College between January 2016 and August 2018. The essential patient information was obtained from the Medical Record Department (MRD) at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH), Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (DMIMS) Sawangi (Meghe) Wardha. The patients were categorized into three groups: the NLF, the BFP, and the PMF groups. Each group had 16 patients, and factors such as interincisal width, diminished burning sensation in the mouth, inter-commissure distance, and flap necrosis were compared pre- and post-operatively. Student's unpaired t-test and chi-square test were employed for statistical analysis.
resultMean interincisal mouth-opening increased from pre-operative 4.79 to 41.42 mm post-operatively in the NLF group, BFP group from 6 to 39.42 mm and in the PMF group from 9.26 to 39.34 mm with p value=0.0001. NLF group showed complete and partial resolution of the burning sensation of the mouth at 93.75% and 6.25%, BFP at 62.25% and 32.75% while in PMF it was 68.5% and 31.25% respectively. One year postoperatively 3.28 mm increase in inter-commissure width was observed in the NLF group with a marginal increase in the PMF group and a negligible increase in the BFP group. 18.75% partial flap necrosis was seen in BFP, 18.75% in the PMF group, and 6.25% in the NFL group.
conclusionAll the flaps are efficacious in treating OSMF, however, NLF stands ahead with its higher reliability owing to its excellent blood supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.