Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872463›Full record

ArticleCytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Single molecule visualization of tropomyosin isoform organization in the mammalian actin cytoskeleton.

Maria L Cagigas, Nicholas Ariotti, Jeff Hook, James Rae, Robert G Parton, Nicole S Bryce, Peter W Gunning, Edna C Hardeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria L CagigasSchool of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Nicholas AriottiSchool of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jeff HookSchool of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
James RaeInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Robert G PartonInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Nicole S BryceSchool of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Peter W GunningSchool of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0833-3128
Edna C HardemanSchool of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1079866Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1100202Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1102730Australian Research Council (ARC) DP160101623Australian Research Council (ARC) Laureate Fellowship FL210100107NHMRC Fellowship APP1156489The Kid's Cancer Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The actin cytoskeleton is composed of both branched and unbranched actin filaments. In mammals, the unbranched actin filaments are primarily copolymers of actin and tropomyosin. Biochemical and imaging studies indicate that different tropomyosin isoforms are segregated to different actin filament populations in cells and tissues, providing isoform-specific functionality to the actin filament. Intrinsic to this model is the prediction that single-molecule imaging of tropomyosin isoforms would confirm homopolymer formation along the length of single actin filaments, a knowledge gap that remains unaddressed in the cellular environment. We combined chemical labeling of genetically engineered tropomyosin isoforms with electron tomography to locate individual tropomyosin molecules in fibroblasts. We find that the organization of two non-muscle tropomyosins, Tpm3.1 with Tpm4.2, can be distinguished from each other using light and electron microscopy. Visualization of single tropomyosin molecules associated with actin filaments supports the hypothesis that tropomyosins form continuous homopolymers, instead of heteropolymers, in the presence of all physiologically native actin-binding proteins. This is true for both isoforms tested. Furthermore, the data suggest that the tropomyosin molecules on one side of an actin filament may not be in register with those on the opposite side, indicating that each tropomyosin polymer may assembly independently.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonSingle Molecule ImagingTropomyosinAnimalsFibroblastsHumansMiceProtein IsoformsProtein IsoformsTropomyosinactincytoskeletonelectron microscopyisoformstropomyosin

Identifiers

PMID38872463
PMCPMC11748362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.