ArticleCancer medicine2024
Diagnostic and prognostic significance of circulating secreted frizzled-related protein 5 in colorectal cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and prognostic significance of circulating secreted frizzled-related protein 5 in colorectal cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSecreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 (SFRP5) modulates Wnt signalling pathways, affecting diverse biological processes. We assessed the diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating SFRP5 (cSFRP5) in colorectal cancer (CRC)
methodsPlasma cSFRP5 concentrations were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in healthy donors (n = 133), individuals diagnosed with CRC (n = 449), colorectal polyps (n = 85), and medical conditions in other organs including cancer, inflammation, and benign states (n = 64).
resultsPatients with CRC, polyps, and other conditions showed higher cSFRP5 levels than healthy individuals (p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curves comparing healthy donors with medical conditions, polyps and CRC were 0.814 (p < 0.0001), 0.763 (p < 0.0001) and 0.762 (p < 0.0001), respectively. In CRC, cSFRP5 correlated with patient age (p < 0.0001), tumour stage (p < 0.0001), and histological differentiation (p = 0.0273). Levels, adjusted for patient age, sex, plasma age and collection institution, peaked in stage II versus I (p < 0.0001), III (p = 0.0002) and IV (p < 0.0001), were lowest in stage I versus III (p = 0.0002) and IV (p = 0.0413), with no difference between stage III and IV. Elevated cSFRP5 levels predicted longer overall survival in stages II-III CRC (univariate: HR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.02-3.26, p = 0.024; multivariable: HR 2.34, 95% CI: 1.12-4.88, p = 0.015).
conclusionThis study confirms cSFRP5 levels are elevated in CRC compared to healthy control and reveals a correlation between elevated cSFRP5 and overall survival in stages II-III disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.