Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872378›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Comparing in vitro cytotoxic drug sensitivity in colon and pancreatic cancer using 2D and 3D cell models: Contrasting viability and growth inhibition in clinically relevant dose and repeated drug cycles.

Tia R Tidwell, Gro Røsland, Karl Johan Tronstad, Kjetil Søreide, Hanne R Hagland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tia R TidwellDepartment of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Engineering, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Gro RøslandDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Karl Johan TronstadDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kjetil SøreideDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Hanne R HaglandDepartment of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Engineering, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7470-1358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn vitro drug screening that is more translatable to the in vivo tumor environment can reduce both time and cost of cancer drug development. Here we address some of the shortcomings in screening and show how treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in 2D and 3D culture models of colorectal cancer (CRC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) give different responses regarding growth inhibition.

methodsThe sensitivity of the cell lines at clinically relevant 5-FU concentrations was monitored over 4 days of treatment in both 2D and 3D cultures for CRC (SW948 and HCT116) and PDAC (Panc-1 and MIA-Pa-Ca-2) cell lines. The 3D cultures were maintained beyond this point to enable a second treatment cycle at Day 14, following the timeline of a standard clinical 5-FU regimen.

resultsEvaluation after one cycle did not reveal significant growth inhibition in any of the CRC or PDAC 2D models. By the end of the second cycle of treatment the CRC spheroids reached 50% inhibition at clinically achievable concentrations in the 3D model, but not in the 2D model. The PDAC models were not sensitive to clinical doses even after two cycles. High content viability metrics point to even lower response in the resistant PDAC models.

conclusionThis study reveals the limitations of testing drugs in 2D cancer models and short exposure in 3D models, and the importance of using appropriate growth inhibition analysis. We found that screening with longer exposure and several cycles of treatment in 3D models suggests a more reliable way to assess drug sensitivity.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationCell SurvivalFluorouracilPancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorColonic NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansSpheroids, CellularAntineoplastic AgentsFluorouracil3D cancer spheroids5‐fluorouracilcolorectal cancer (CRC)drug screeningpancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Identifiers

PMID38872378
PMCPMC11176582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.