ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2024
Causal analysis of air pollution mixtures: estimands, positivity, and extrapolation.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Everything All at Once: On Choosing an Estimand for Multi-component Environmental Exposures.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.Environmental health perspectives · 2026Review
- Robust Statistical Approaches to Understanding the Causal Effect of Air Pollution Mixtures.Research report (Health Effects Institute) · 2025Article
- TREATMENT EFFECT HETEROGENEITY AND IMPORTANCE MEASURES FOR MULTIVARIATE CONTINUOUS TREATMENTS.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- A Simple Diagnostic for the Positivity Assumption for Continuous Exposures.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Statistical Methods for Chemical Mixtures: A Roadmap for Practitioners Using Simulation Studies and a Sample Data Analysis in the PROTECT Cohort.Environmental health perspectives · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Causal inference for air pollution mixtures is an increasingly important issue with appreciable challenges. When the exposure is a multivariate mixture, there are many exposure contrasts that may be of nominal interest for causal effect estimation, but the complex joint mixture distribution often renders observed data extremely limited in their ability to inform estimates of many commonly defined causal effects. We use potential outcomes to (1) define causal effects of air pollution mixtures, (2) formalize the key assumption of mixture positivity required for estimation, and (3) offer diagnostic metrics for positivity violations in the mixture setting that allow researchers to assess the extent to which data can actually support estimation of mixture effects of interest. For settings where there is limited empirical support, we redefine causal estimands that apportion causal effects according to whether they can be directly informed by observed data versus rely entirely on model extrapolation, isolating key sources of information on the causal effect of an air pollution mixture. The ideas are deployed to assess the ability of a national US data set on the chemical components of ambient particulate matter air pollution to support estimation of a variety of causal mixture effects. This article is part of a Special Collection on Environmental Epidemiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.