ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024
Trends in chemotherapy use for early-stage breast cancer from 2006 to 2019.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive Behavior vs Bright Light Therapy for Insomnia in Women Undergoing Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- High mid-treatment tumour RNA disruption in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer is associated with improved disease-free survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Trial
- Pathological assessment of tumour beds in breast excisions post-neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective cohort study.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of radiotherapy dose to the axilla in cN + /ypN0 breast cancer after primary systemic therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy: toward true de-escalation of axillary management.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Clinician- and facility-level factors associated with chemotherapy dose reductions in stages I-IIIA breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Older Adults With Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Breast Surgical Perspectives on the NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304 Trial on Omission of Regional Nodal Irradiation After Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The landscape of chemotherapy modifications among women treated for stage I-IIIA breast cancer.Cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinician- and Facility-Level Factors Associated With Receipt of Nonguideline Chemotherapy Regimens in Women With Stage I-IIIA Breast Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in neoadjuvant chemotherapy patterns and outcomes in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Long-term weight change among breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: a longitudinal study over 13 years.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about how use of chemotherapy has evolved in breast cancer patients. We therefore describe chemotherapy patterns for women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) Study using data from KPNC (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) and KPWA (Kaiser Permanente Washington).
findingsAmong 33,670 women, aged 18 + y, diagnosed with primary stage I-IIIA breast cancer at KPNC and KPWA from 2006 to 2019, we explored patterns of intravenous chemotherapy use, defined here as receipt of intravenous cytotoxic drugs and/or anti-HER2 therapies. We evaluated trends in chemotherapy receipt, duration over which chemotherapy was received, and number of associated infusion visits. In secondary analyses, we stratified by receipt of anti-HER2 therapies (trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab), given their longer duration. 38.9% received chemotherapy intravenously, declining from 40.2% in 2006 to 35.6% in 2019 (p-trend < 0.001). Among 13,089 women receiving chemotherapy, neoadjuvant treatment increased (4.1-14.7%; p-trend < 0.001), as did receipt of anti-HER2 therapies (20.8-30.9%) (p-trend < 0.001). The average treatment duration increased (5.3 to 6.0 months; p-trend < 0.001), as did the number of infusion visits (10.8 to 12.5; p-trend < 0.001). For those receiving anti-HER2 therapies, treatment duration and average number of visits decreased; among those not receiving anti-HER2 therapies, number of visits increased, with no change in duration.
conclusionsWhile the prevalence of chemotherapy receipt has decreased over time, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has increased, as has use of anti-HER2 therapies; duration and number of administration visits have also increased. Understanding these trends is useful to inform clinical and administrative planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.