Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872159›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Challenges to the operation of Brazilian LTCIs and changes in oversight.

Letycia Parreira de Oliveira, Henrique Salmazo da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Letycia Parreira de OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Gerontologia. Brasília, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil. letyciaparreira@gmail.com.
Henrique Salmazo da SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Gerontologia. Brasília, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 420859/2018-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite 18 years since health surveillance regulations were promulgated in Brazil to govern Long-Term Care Institutions for Older Adults (LTCIs), many institutions fail to comply with the Differentiated Regime for Public Procurement (Resolution No. 502/2021) due to structural and operational conditions. This study aimed to investigate Brazilian LTCI managers' understanding of challenges that significantly impact institutional operation and gather suggestions for enhancing RDC No. 502/21.

methodsA cross-sectional, exploratory, and qualitative study was conducted, involving 90 managers or technical supervisors from Brazilian LTCIs. Data were collected using a self-administered Google Forms instrument and analyzed through Thematic Analysis based on the Organizing for Quality (OQ) framework.

resultsThe most impactful challenges for LTCIs were healthcare, financing, human resources, relationship with oversight bodies, and family members. DISCUSSION: Proposed improvements for RDC No. 502/21 included enhanced professional training, infrastructure revision, increased financial support from the state, realistic oversight/regulations, and tailored monitoring approaches.

conclusionLTCIs in Brazil face numerous challenges, and the suggested improvements aim to adapt regulations to institutional realities. However, considering the regulations' variability and purposes, further investigation is warranted.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHomes for the AgedHumansQualitative ResearchCareHealth careLong-term care institution for older adultsOlder adultsPolicy

Identifiers

PMID38872159
PMCPMC11177510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.