Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872117›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2024

Comparison of anaesthesia strategies on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Ying Yang, Bucheng Liao, Ruoxi Deng, Liwei Ren, Yongjie Sun, Shaowei Xiong, Xinhai Wu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1200 Lianhua Street, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036, China.
Bucheng LiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1200 Lianhua Street, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036, China.
Ruoxi DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1200 Lianhua Street, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036, China.
Liwei RenHubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Shenzhen, China.
Yongjie SunHubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Shenzhen, China.
Shaowei XiongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xinhai WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1200 Lianhua Street, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036, China. wuxinhai@pkuszh.com.

Funding

the General Program for Clinical Research at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital grant no. LCYJ 2020016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-operative anaesthesia management should be optimised to reduce the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients; however, a single intervention may not effectively reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting in such patients. This study assessed the effect of an optimised anaesthetic protocol versus a conventional one on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

methodsA single-centre randomised trial was conducted at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from June 2021 to December 2022. Among 168 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 116 qualified, and 103 completed the study with available data. Patients were categorized into the conventional group (received sevoflurane and standard fluids) and the optimised group (underwent propofol-based anaesthesia and was administered goal-directed fluids). The primary endpoints were postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence and severity within 24 h.

resultsPostoperative nausea and vomiting assessment at 0-3 h post-surgery revealed no significant differences between groups. However, at 3-24 h, the optimised anaesthetic protocol group showed lower postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence and severity than those of the conventional group (P = 0.005). In the conventional group, 20 (37.04%) patients experienced moderate-to-severe postoperative nausea and vomiting, compared to six (12.25%) patients in the optimised group (odds ratio = 0.237; 95% CI = 0.086, 0.656; P = 0.006). No significant differences were noted in antiemetic treatment, moderate-to-severe pain incidence, anaesthesia recovery, post-anaesthetic care unit stay, or postoperative duration between the groups. While the total intra-operative infusion volumes were comparable, the optimised group had a significantly higher colloidal infusion volume (500 mL vs. 0 mL, P = 0.014) than that of the conventional group.

conclusionsThe incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting 3-24 h postoperatively in patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were significantly lower with propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia and goal-directed fluid therapy than with sevoflurane anaesthesia and traditional fluid management. Total intravenous anaesthesia is an effective multimodal antiemetic strategy for bariatric surgery.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-TRC- 2,100,046,534, registration date: 21 May 2021).

Indexed as

GastrectomyLaparoscopyPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPropofolSevofluraneAdultAnesthesiaAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolSevofluraneBariatric surgeryGoal-directed fluid therapyLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyPostoperative nausea and vomitingTotal intravenous anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID38872117
PMCPMC11170773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.