Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872097›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Dyport: dynamic importance-based biomedical hypothesis generation benchmarking technique.

Ilya Tyagin, Ilya Safro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilya TyaginCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19713, USA. tyagin@udel.edu.
Ilya SafroDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA. isafro@udel.edu.

Funding

Knowledge discovery and machine learning to elucidate the mechanisms of HIV activity and interaction with substance use disorderR01DA054992 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI SAFRO, ILYA, SHTUTMAN, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
National Institute of Health, United States R01DA054992NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomated hypothesis generation (HG) focuses on uncovering hidden connections within the extensive information that is publicly available. This domain has become increasingly popular, thanks to modern machine learning algorithms. However, the automated evaluation of HG systems is still an open problem, especially on a larger scale.

resultsThis paper presents a novel benchmarking framework Dyport for evaluating biomedical hypothesis generation systems. Utilizing curated datasets, our approach tests these systems under realistic conditions, enhancing the relevance of our evaluations. We integrate knowledge from the curated databases into a dynamic graph, accompanied by a method to quantify discovery importance. This not only assesses hypotheses accuracy but also their potential impact in biomedical research which significantly extends traditional link prediction benchmarks. Applicability of our benchmarking process is demonstrated on several link prediction systems applied on biomedical semantic knowledge graphs. Being flexible, our benchmarking system is designed for broad application in hypothesis generation quality verification, aiming to expand the scope of scientific discovery within the biomedical research community.

conclusionsDyport is an open-source benchmarking framework designed for biomedical hypothesis generation systems evaluation, which takes into account knowledge dynamics, semantics and impact. All code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/IlyaTyagin/Dyport .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomedical ResearchComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualMachine LearningSemanticsSoftwareBenchmarkingHypothesis GenerationLink PredictionLiterature-based DiscoveryNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID38872097
PMCPMC11177514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.