ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Correlation study of functional magnetic resonance index and clinicopathological features of rectal cancer.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlation between baseline magnetic resonance imaging features and serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with primary rectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the correlation between DCE-MRI, R2*, IVIM, and clinicopathological features of rectal cancer.
methodsThis was a prospective study, enrolling 42 patients with rectal cancer, 20 of whom underwent rectal mesorectal excision. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scanning was performed preoperatively in all patients, and additional preoperative scanning of R2* imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion was performed in those who underwent surgery. Artificially delineate the ROI around the tumor. Functional magnetic resonance index parameters K
resultsDEC-MRI, R2*, and IVIM have certain application values in the distance from the lower margin of the tumor to the anorectal ring, imaging T stage and N stage, tumor markers CEA and CA199, immunohistochemical indexes Ki-76 and P53, lymph node cancer metastasis, and rectal fascia status (P < 0.05).
conclusionDEC-MRI, R2*, and IVIM provide reliable quantitative parameters for preoperative clinicopathological evaluation of patients with rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38872052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.