Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872042›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024

Reproducibility and repeatability of quantitative T2 and T2* mapping of osteosarcomas in a mouse model.

Raheleh Roudi, Laura J Pisani, Fabrizio Pisani, Tie Liang, Heike E Daldrup-Link

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raheleh RoudiDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Raheleroudi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5023-4743
Laura J PisaniDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Fabrizio PisaniDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Tie LiangDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Heike E Daldrup-LinkDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. heiked@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew immunotherapies activate tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the osteosarcoma microenvironment. Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are phagocytosed by TAMs and, therefore, enable TAM detection on T2*- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. We assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of T2*- and T2-mapping of osteosarcomas in a mouse model.

methodsFifteen BALB/c mice bearing-murine osteosarcomas underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 3-T and 7-T scanners before and after intravenous IONP infusion, using T2*-weighted multi-gradient-echo, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, and T2-weighted multi-echo sequences. Each sequence was repeated twice. Tumor T2 and T2* relaxation times were measured twice by two independent investigators. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements were assessed.

resultsWe found excellent agreement between duplicate acquisitions for both T2* and T2 measurements at either magnetic field strength, by the same individual (repeatability), and between individuals (reproducibility). The repeatability concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for T2* values were 0.99 (coefficients of variation (CoV) 4.43%) for reader 1 and 0.98 (CoV 5.82%) for reader 2. The reproducibility of T2* values between the two readers was 0.99 (CoV 3.32%) for the first acquisitions and 0.99 (CoV 6.30%) for the second acquisitions. Regarding T2 values, the repeatability of CCC was similar for both readers, 0.98 (CoV 3.64% for reader 1 and 4.45% for reader 2). The CCC of the reproducibility of T2 was 0.99 (CoV 3.1%) for the first acquisition and 0.98 (CoV 4.38%) for the second acquisition.

conclusionsOur results demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative T2* and T2 mapping for monitoring the presence of TAMs in osteosarcomas. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: T2* and T2 measurements of osteosarcomas on IONP-enhanced MRI could allow identifying patients who may benefit from TAM-modulating immunotherapies and for monitoring treatment response. The technique described here could be also applied across a wide range of other solid tumors. KEY POINTS: • Optimal integration of TAM-modulating immunotherapies with conventional chemotherapy remains poorly elucidated. • We found high repeatability of T2* and T2 measurements of osteosarcomas in a mouse model, both with and without IONPs contrast, at 3-T and 7-T MRI field strengths. • T2 and T2* mapping may be used to determine response to macrophage-modulating cancer immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMice, Inbred BALB COsteosarcomaAnimalsFemaleMiceReproducibility of ResultsMagnetic iron oxide nanoparticlesMagnetic resonance imagingMice (inbred BALB/c)OsteosarcomaTumor-associated macrophages

Identifiers

PMID38872042
PMCPMC11176138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.