ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024
Reproducibility and repeatability of quantitative T2 and T2* mapping of osteosarcomas in a mouse model.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging signal variation for the effective quantitative evaluation of treatment response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy of osteosarcoma: a comparative study with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Quantitative Preclinical Imaging as a Metrological Framework: Reproducibility, Validation, and Translational Maturity.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Predicting resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma using machine learning with clinical data and T2-weighted MRI radiomics.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- T2* mapping in magnetic resonance imaging for stratifying the hypoxic microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a preliminary study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Introduction to animal modelling: factors and tools for choosing the optimal model for sarcoma research-a comprehensive literature review.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Comparison of methods for in vivo and ex vivo quantification of iron in murine brain tumors.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNew immunotherapies activate tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the osteosarcoma microenvironment. Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are phagocytosed by TAMs and, therefore, enable TAM detection on T2*- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. We assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of T2*- and T2-mapping of osteosarcomas in a mouse model.
methodsFifteen BALB/c mice bearing-murine osteosarcomas underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 3-T and 7-T scanners before and after intravenous IONP infusion, using T2*-weighted multi-gradient-echo, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, and T2-weighted multi-echo sequences. Each sequence was repeated twice. Tumor T2 and T2* relaxation times were measured twice by two independent investigators. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements were assessed.
resultsWe found excellent agreement between duplicate acquisitions for both T2* and T2 measurements at either magnetic field strength, by the same individual (repeatability), and between individuals (reproducibility). The repeatability concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for T2* values were 0.99 (coefficients of variation (CoV) 4.43%) for reader 1 and 0.98 (CoV 5.82%) for reader 2. The reproducibility of T2* values between the two readers was 0.99 (CoV 3.32%) for the first acquisitions and 0.99 (CoV 6.30%) for the second acquisitions. Regarding T2 values, the repeatability of CCC was similar for both readers, 0.98 (CoV 3.64% for reader 1 and 4.45% for reader 2). The CCC of the reproducibility of T2 was 0.99 (CoV 3.1%) for the first acquisition and 0.98 (CoV 4.38%) for the second acquisition.
conclusionsOur results demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative T2* and T2 mapping for monitoring the presence of TAMs in osteosarcomas. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: T2* and T2 measurements of osteosarcomas on IONP-enhanced MRI could allow identifying patients who may benefit from TAM-modulating immunotherapies and for monitoring treatment response. The technique described here could be also applied across a wide range of other solid tumors. KEY POINTS: • Optimal integration of TAM-modulating immunotherapies with conventional chemotherapy remains poorly elucidated. • We found high repeatability of T2* and T2 measurements of osteosarcomas in a mouse model, both with and without IONPs contrast, at 3-T and 7-T MRI field strengths. • T2 and T2* mapping may be used to determine response to macrophage-modulating cancer immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.