ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Optimization and evaluation of facial recognition models for Williams-Beuren syndrome.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A Transfer Learning-Based VGG-16 Model for COD Detection in UV-Vis Spectroscopy.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Optimizing hyperparameters of YOLOv10 for arson detection using advanced optimization algorithms.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by special facial gestalt, delayed development, and supravalvular aortic stenosis or/and stenosis of the branches of the pulmonary artery. We aim to develop and optimize accurate models of facial recognition to assist in the diagnosis of WBS, and to evaluate their effectiveness by using both five-fold cross-validation and an external test set. We used a total of 954 images from 135 patients with WBS, 124 patients suffering from other genetic disorders, and 183 healthy children. The training set comprised 852 images of 104 WBS cases, 91 cases of other genetic disorders, and 145 healthy children from September 2017 to December 2021 at the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital. We constructed six binary classification models of facial recognition for WBS by using EfficientNet-b3, ResNet-50, VGG-16, VGG-16BN, VGG-19, and VGG-19BN. Transfer learning was used to pre-train the models, and each model was modified with a variable cosine learning rate. Each model was first evaluated by using five-fold cross-validation and then assessed on the external test set. The latter contained 102 images of 31 children suffering from WBS, 33 children with other genetic disorders, and 38 healthy children. To compare the capabilities of these models of recognition with those of human experts in terms of identifying cases of WBS, we recruited two pediatricians, a pediatric cardiologist, and a pediatric geneticist to identify the WBS patients based solely on their facial images. We constructed six models of facial recognition for diagnosing WBS using EfficientNet-b3, ResNet-50, VGG-16, VGG-16BN, VGG-19, and VGG-19BN. The model based on VGG-19BN achieved the best performance in terms of five-fold cross-validation, with an accuracy of 93.74% ± 3.18%, precision of 94.93% ± 4.53%, specificity of 96.10% ± 4.30%, and F1 score of 91.65% ± 4.28%, while the VGG-16BN model achieved the highest recall value of 91.63% ± 5.96%. The VGG-19BN model also achieved the best performance on the external test set, with an accuracy of 95.10%, precision of 100%, recall of 83.87%, specificity of 93.42%, and F1 score of 91.23%. The best performance by human experts on the external test set yielded values of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 scores of 77.45%, 60.53%, 77.42%, 83.10%, and 66.67%, respectively. The F1 score of each human expert was lower than those of the EfficientNet-b3 (84.21%), ResNet-50 (74.51%), VGG-16 (85.71%), VGG-16BN (85.71%), VGG-19 (83.02%), and VGG-19BN (91.23%) models.
conclusionThe results showed that facial recognition technology can be used to accurately diagnose patients with WBS. Facial recognition models based on VGG-19BN can play a crucial role in its clinical diagnosis. Their performance can be improved by expanding the size of the training dataset, optimizing the CNN architectures applied, and modifying them with a variable cosine learning rate. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The facial gestalt of WBS, often described as "elfin," includes a broad forehead, periorbital puffiness, a flat nasal bridge, full cheeks, and a small chin. • Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of deep convolutional neural networks for facial recognition as a diagnostic tool for WBS. WHAT IS NEW: • This study develops six models of facial recognition, EfficientNet-b3, ResNet-50, VGG-16, VGG-16BN, VGG-19, and VGG-19BN, to improve WBS diagnosis. • The VGG-19BN model achieved the best performance, with an accuracy of 95.10% and specificity of 93.42%. The facial recognition model based on VGG-19BN can play a crucial role in the clinical diagnosis of WBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38871980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.