Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38871958›Full record

ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2024

Carbon dioxide guidelines for indoor air quality: a review.

Mark J Mendell, Wenhao Chen, Dilhara R Ranasinghe, Rosemary Castorina, Kazukiyo Kumagai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rebreathing during CPAP therapy and its implications in obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Short-Term Forecast of Indoor COSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark J MendellCalifornia Department of Public Health, Center for Laboratory Science, Air Quality Section, Richmond, CA, USA. mark.mendell@cdph.ca.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-7194-7654
Wenhao ChenCalifornia Department of Public Health, Center for Laboratory Science, Air Quality Section, Richmond, CA, USA.
Dilhara R RanasingheCalifornia Department of Public Health, Center for Laboratory Science, Air Quality Section, Richmond, CA, USA.
Rosemary CastorinaCalifornia Department of Public Health, Center for Laboratory Science, Air Quality Section, Richmond, CA, USA.
Kazukiyo KumagaiCalifornia Department of Public Health, Center for Laboratory Science, Air Quality Section, Richmond, CA, USA.

Funding

CDC HHS CDC-RFA-OE22-2203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of building ventilation to protect health has been more widely recognized since the COVID-19 pandemic. Outdoor air ventilation in buildings dilutes indoor-generated air pollutants (including bioaerosols) and reduces resulting occupant exposures. Many countries and organizations have advisory guidelines or mandatory standards for minimum ventilation rates (VRs) to maintain indoor air quality (IAQ). Because directly measuring VRs is often difficult, many IAQ guidelines instead specify indoor concentration limits for carbon dioxide (CO

objectiveTo review current indoor CO

methodsWe identified worldwide CO

resultsAmong 43 guidelines identified, 35 set single CO IMPACT: Many current indoor carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorCarbon DioxideCOVID-19Guidelines as TopicSARS-CoV-2VentilationAir PollutantsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansAir PollutantsCarbon DioxideCOVID-19StandardsVentilation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.