Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38871944›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Time-Dependent Deep Learning Prediction of Multiple Sclerosis Disability.

John D Mayfield, Ryan Murtagh, John Ciotti, Derrick Robertson, Issam El Naqa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John D MayfieldUSF Health Department of Radiology, 2 Tampa General Circle, STC 6103, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. jdmayfield@usf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5063-6160
Ryan MurtaghUSF Health Department of Radiology, 2 Tampa General Circle, STC 6103, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
John CiottiDepartment of Neurology, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Multiple Sclerosis Center, 13330 USF Laurel Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Derrick RobertsonDepartment of Neurology, James A. Haley VA Medical Center, 13000 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Issam El NaqaUniversity of South Florida, College of Engineering, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of deep learning models in medical image analysis concentrate on single snapshot timepoint circumstances, such as the identification of current pathology on a given image or volume. This is often in contrast to the diagnostic methodology in radiology where presumed pathologic findings are correlated to prior studies and subsequent changes over time. For multiple sclerosis (MS), the current body of literature describes various forms of lesion segmentation with few studies analyzing disability progression over time. For the purpose of longitudinal time-dependent analysis, we propose a combinatorial analysis of a video vision transformer (ViViT) benchmarked against traditional recurrent neural network of Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architectures and a hybrid Vision Transformer-LSTM (ViT-LSTM) to predict long-term disability based upon the Extended Disability Severity Score (EDSS). The patient cohort was procured from a two-site institution with 703 patients' multisequence, contrast-enhanced MRIs of the cervical spine between the years 2002 and 2023. Following a competitive performance analysis, a VGG-16-based CNN-LSTM was compared to ViViT with an ablation analysis to determine time-dependency of the models. The VGG16-LSTM predicted trinary classification of EDSS score in 6 years with 0.74 AUC versus the ViViT with 0.84 AUC (p-value < 0.001 per 5 × 2 cross-validation F-test) on an 80:20 hold-out testing split. However, the VGG16-LSTM outperformed ViViT when patients with only 2 years of MRIs (n = 94) (0.75 AUC versus 0.72 AUC, respectively). Exact EDSS classification was investigated for both models using both classification and regression strategies but showed collectively worse performance. Our experimental results demonstrate the ability of time-dependent deep learning models to predict disability in MS using trinary stratification of disability, mimicking clinical practice. Further work includes external validation and subsequent observational clinical trials.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleNeural Networks, ComputerTime FactorsArtificial intelligenceMedical imagingMultiple sclerosisTime-dependent deep learningVideo transformers

Identifiers

PMID38871944
PMCPMC11612123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.