Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38871793›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Force and power requirement for development of cumin harvester: a dynamic approach.

Mohit Kumar, Pramod Kumar Sahoo, Dilip Kumar Kushwaha, Indra Mani, Nrusingh Charan Pradhan, Abhishek Patel, Aqil Tariq, Sajid Ullah, Walid Soufan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohit KumarSri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner-Jaipur, 303329, India.
Pramod Kumar SahooICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Dilip Kumar KushwahaICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Indra ManiVasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, 431402, India.
Nrusingh Charan PradhanICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Abhishek PatelDepartment of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Post Harvest Technology, CAU Imphal, 737135, India.
Aqil TariqDepartment of Wildlife Fisheries and Aquaculture, College of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762-9690, United States. at2139@msstate.edu.
Sajid UllahDepartment of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Nangarhar University, Jalalabad, 2600, Nangarhar, Afghanistan. sajidjalwan@gmail.com.
Walid SoufanPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An experimental setup was developed for simulating the field conditions to determine the force and power required for cutting cumin crops in dynamic conditions. The effect of cutter bar speeds, forward speeds, and blade type on cutting force and power requirement for cutting cumin were also studied. Experiments were carried out at three levels: cutter bar speeds, forward speeds, and blade type. The results showed that all the factors significantly affected cutting force. The cutting force followed a decreasing trend with the increase in cutter bar speed. Whereas it followed an increasing trend with the increase in forward speed. The maximum cutting force for all three blades was observed at a cutter bar speed of 2.00 strokes.s

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalCrop ProductionNigella sativaBlade typeCuminCutting forceDynamic conditionsPower

Identifiers

PMID38871793
PMCPMC11176396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.