ArticleScientific reports2024
Robust diagnosis and meta visualizations of plant diseases through deep neural architecture with explainable AI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- GreenAid: a confidence-weighted ensemble deep learning system for real-time plant disease detection and management.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable CNN framework for accurate crop disease detection using plant leaf images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AgroDualNet: a dual deep learning-based crop disease forecasting and fruit ripening detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-performance parallel multi-scale attention network with explainable AI for intelligent diagnosis of leaf diseases in agricultural systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An interpretable crop leaf disease and pest identification model based on prototypical part network and contrastive learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of deep learning models using explainable AI with qualitative and quantitative analysis for rice leaf disease detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of post-harvest agricultural product deterioration signature volatile organic compounds.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- An Indian UAV and leaf image dataset for integrated crop health assessment of soybean crop.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence: the human response to approach the complexity of big data in biology.GigaScience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning has emerged as a highly effective and precise method for classifying images. The presence of plant diseases poses a significant threat to food security. However, accurately identifying these diseases in plants is challenging due to limited infrastructure and techniques. Fortunately, the recent advancements in deep learning within the field of computer vision have opened up new possibilities for diagnosing plant pathology. Detecting plant diseases at an early stage is crucial, and this research paper proposes a deep convolutional neural network model that can rapidly and accurately identify plant diseases. Given the minimal variation in image texture and color, deep learning techniques are essential for robust recognition. In this study, we introduce a deep, explainable neural architecture specifically designed for recognizing plant diseases. Fine-tuned deep convolutional neural network is designed by freezing the layers and adjusting the weights of learnable layers. By extracting deep features from a down sampled feature map of a fine-tuned neural network, we are able to classify these features using a customized K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm. To train and validate our model, we utilize the largest standard plant village dataset, which consists of 38 classes. To evaluate the performance of our proposed system, we estimate specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and AUC. The results demonstrate that our system achieves an impressive maximum validation accuracy of 99.95% and an AUC of 1, making it the most ideal and highest-performing approach compared to current state-of-the-art deep learning methods for automatically identifying plant diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.