ArticleScientific data2024
Biomedical Data Repository Concepts and Management Principles.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organoid Intelligent Morphomics: Decoding the organoid morphome through artificial intelligence from phenotypic quantification to mechanistic insight.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- HuBMAP Data Portal: a resource for multimodal spatial and single-cell data of healthy human tissues.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Data-derived Identity Verification as a principle for the dissemination, harmonization, and artificial intelligence reuse of sensitive biomedical data.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- FAIR m-BIDS: Advancing brain data utilization through multimodal and FAIR principles.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2026.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- FAIR Omics Data Management: Overview, Challenges, and Best Practices.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Navigating open data sharing and privacy in the age of clinical AI research: from reidentification to pseudo-reidentification.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Making genomic data FAIR through effective Data Portals.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Infectious, Allergic, and Immune-Mediated Disease Data Resources: a Landscape Overview and Subset Assessment.Journal of medical systems · 2025Review
- Article
- Data standards for single-cell RNA-sequencing of paediatric cancer.Clinical & translational immunology · 2025Review
- HumanIslets.com: Improving accessibility, integration, and usability of human research islet data.Cell metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The demand for open data and open science is on the rise, fueled by expectations from the scientific community, calls to increase transparency and reproducibility in research findings, and developments such as the Final Data Management and Sharing Policy from the U.S. National Institutes of Health and a memorandum on increasing public access to federally funded research, issued by the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy. This paper explores the pivotal role of data repositories in biomedical research and open science, emphasizing their importance in managing, preserving, and sharing research data. Our objective is to familiarize readers with the functions of data repositories, set expectations for their services, and provide an overview of methods to evaluate their capabilities. The paper serves to introduce fundamental concepts and community-based guiding principles and aims to equip researchers, repository operators, funders, and policymakers with the knowledge to select appropriate repositories for their data management and sharing needs and foster a foundation for the open sharing and preservation of research data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.