Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38871711›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Topological regression as an interpretable and efficient tool for quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling.

Ruibo Zhang, Daniel Nolte, Cesar Sanchez-Villalobos, Souparno Ghosh, Ranadip Pal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruibo Zhang *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Daniel Nolte *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Cesar Sanchez-VillalobosDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8621-2016
Souparno GhoshDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NB, 68588, USA. sghosh5@unl.edu.
Ranadip PalDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. ranadip.pal@ttu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9311-5901

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2007418National Science Foundation (NSF) 2007903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling is a powerful tool for drug discovery, yet the lack of interpretability of commonly used QSAR models hinders their application in molecular design. We propose a similarity-based regression framework, topological regression (TR), that offers a statistically grounded, computationally fast, and interpretable technique to predict drug responses. We compare the predictive performance of TR on 530 ChEMBL human target activity datasets against the predictive performance of deep-learning-based QSAR models. Our results suggest that our sparse TR model can achieve equal, if not better, performance than the deep learning-based QSAR models and provide better intuitive interpretation by extracting an approximate isometry between the chemical space of the drugs and their activity space.

Indexed as

Deep LearningQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAlgorithmsDrug DiscoveryHumansRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID38871711
PMCPMC11176398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.