Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38871251›Full record

ReviewMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2024

Rescoring Peptide Spectrum Matches: Boosting Proteomics Performance by Integrating Peptide Property Predictors Into Peptide Identification.

Mostafa Kalhor, Joel Lapin, Mario Picciani, Mathias Wilhelm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Benchmarking Software for DDA-PASEF Immunopeptidomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mostafa KalhorComputational Mass Spectrometry, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Joel LapinComputational Mass Spectrometry, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Mario PiccianiComputational Mass Spectrometry, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Mathias WilhelmComputational Mass Spectrometry, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany; Munich Data Science Institute, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany. Electronic address: mathias.wilhelm@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rescoring of peptide spectrum matches originating from database search engines enabled by peptide property predictors is exceeding the performance of peptide identification from traditional database search engines. In contrast to the peptide spectrum match scores calculated by traditional database search engines, rescoring peptide spectrum matches generates scores based on comparing observed and predicted peptide properties, such as fragment ion intensities and retention times. These newly generated scores enable a more efficient discrimination between correct and incorrect peptide spectrum matches. This approach was shown to lead to substantial improvements in the number of confidently identified peptides, facilitating the analysis of challenging datasets in various fields such as immunopeptidomics, metaproteomics, proteogenomics, and single-cell proteomics. In this review, we summarize the key elements leading up to the recent introduction of multiple data-driven rescoring pipelines. We provide an overview of relevant post-processing rescoring tools, introduce prominent data-driven rescoring pipelines for various applications, and highlight limitations, opportunities, and future perspectives of this approach and its impact on mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteomicsDatabases, ProteinHumansMass SpectrometrySearch EnginePeptidesartificial intelligencecomputational proteomicsdata-driven rescoringmachine learningpeptide identificationpeptide property predictionrescoring

Identifiers

PMID38871251
PMCPMC11269915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.