ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2024
A validated LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantitation of piperacillin, cefazolin, and cefoxitin in rat plasma and twelve tissues.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physiologically Based Modeling of Cefoxitin, Cefazolin, and Piperacillin Pharmacokinetics in Obese and Lean Rats.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe investigation of drug disposition in tissues is critical to improving dosing strategy and maximizing treatment effectiveness, yet developing a multi-tissue bioanalytical method could be challenging due to the differences among various matrices. Herein, we developed an LC-MS/MS method tailored for the quantitation of piperacillin (PIP), cefazolin (CFZ), and cefoxitin (CFX) in rat plasma and 12 tissues, accompanied by validation data for each matrix according to the FDA and EMA guidelines.
resultsThe method required only a small sample volume (5 μL plasma or 50-100 μL tissue homogenates) and a relatively simple protocol for simultaneous quantitation of PIP, CFZ, and CFX within different biological matrices. Mobile phase A was composed of 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1 % formic acid in water, while mobile phase B contained 0.1 % formic acid in acetonitrile. The mobile phase was pumped through a Synergi Fusion-RP column equipped with a guard column with a gradient elution program at a 0.3 mL/min flow rate. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ionization mode (ESI+) using multiple reaction monitoring. SIGNIFICANCE: The validated method has been successfully applied to quantify PIP, CFZ, and CFX from the plasma and tissue samples collected in a pilot rat study and will further be used in a large pharmacokinetic study. To our knowledge, this is also the first report presenting long-term, freeze-thaw, and autosampler stability data for PIP, CFZ, and CFX in rat plasma and multiple tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.