Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38870678›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2024

Targeting mutant p53 with arsenic trioxide: A preclinical study focusing on triple negative breast cancer.

Subhasree Rajaram, Naoise C Synnott, John Crown, Stephen F Madden, Michael J Duffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Subhasree RajaramUCD School of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Naoise C SynnottUCD School of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland.
John CrownDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin D04 T6F4, Ireland.
Stephen F MaddenData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin D02 YN77, Ireland.
Michael J DuffyUCD School of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland; UCD Clinical Research Centre, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin D04 T6F4, Ireland. Electronic address: Michael.J.Duffy@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New treatments are urgently required for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). As TP53 is mutated in approximately 80% of TNBC, it is theoretically an attractive target for new drugs for this disease. Arsenic trioxide (ATO), which is used to treat promyelocytic leukaemia, was recently shown to reactivate mutant p53 and restore wild-type functionality. The aim of this study was to evaluate ATO as a potential new treatment for TNBC. Using a panel of 20 cell lines, we found that TNBC cell lines were more sensitive to ATO than non-TNBC cell lines (P = 0.045). Consistent with its ability to reactivate mutant p53, ATO was a more potent inhibitor of proliferation in cell lines with mutant TP53 than the wildtype TP53 (P = 0.027). Direct evidence of mutant p53 reactivation was the induction of multiple wild-type p53 canonical target genes such as CDKN1A, SLC7A11, BBC3, PMAIP1, SESN2, SRXN1 and TXNRD1. Our findings support the activation of mutant p53 by ATO and, furthermore, the possible repurposing of ATO to treat TP53-mutated TNBC.

Indexed as

APR-246ATOMutant p53RNA-seqTherapyTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID38870678
PMCPMC11225897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.