ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025
Deep Amplicon Sequencing Reveals Culture-dependent Clonal Selection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Clinical Samples.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Open-access genomic drug resistance prediction tools forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating the Performance of Sputum-Based Targeted Sequencing Against Mycobacterial Whole-Genome Sequencing in Predicting Tuberculosis Drug Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Targeted next-generation sequencing for comprehensive diagnosis and drug resistance detection in pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a single-center retrospective study.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Effect of Bdq-Containing Regimen and Molecular Detection of Bdq Resistance among Pre-XDR-TB Patients with Unfavorable Outcomes.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Whole-genome sequencing reveals transmission pattern and drug resistance ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The commonly-used drug susceptibility testing (DST) relies on bacterial culture and faces shortcomings such as long turnaround time and clonal/subclonal selection biases. Here, we developed a targeted deep amplicon sequencing (DAS) method directly applied to clinical specimens. In this DAS panel, we examined 941 drug-resistant mutations (DRMs) associated with 20 anti-tuberculosis drugs with only 4 pg of initial DNA input, and reduced the clinical testing time from 20 days to 2 days. A prospective study was conducted using 115 clinical specimens, predominantly positive for the Xpert® Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (Xpert MTB/RIF) assay, to evaluate DRM detection. DAS was performed on culture-free specimens, while culture-dependent isolates were used for phenotypic DST, DAS, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). For in silico molecular DST, our result based on DAS panel revealed the similar accuracy to three published reports based on WGS. For 82 isolates, application of DAS using the resistance-determining mutation method showed better accuracy (93.03% vs. 92.16%), sensitivity (96.10% vs. 95.02%), and specificity (91.33% vs. 90.62%) than WGS using the Mykrobe software. Compared to culture-dependent WGS, culture-free DAS provides a full picture of sequence variation at the population level, exhibiting in detail the gain-and-loss variants caused by bacterial culture. Our study performs a systematic verification of the advantages of DAS in clinical applications and comprehensively illustrates the discrepancies in Mycobacterium tuberculosis before and after culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.