Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38870389›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2024

Observational methods for human studies of transgenerational effects.

Rebecca Richards-Steed, Neng Wan, Amanda Bakian, Richard M Medina, Simon C Brewer, Ken R Smith, James A VanDerslice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca Richards-SteedGeography, University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Neng WanGeography, University of Utah Department of Geography, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Amanda BakianPsychiatry, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Richard M MedinaGeography, University of Utah Department of Geography, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Simon C BrewerGeography, University of Utah Department of Geography, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ken R SmithChild and Consumer Studies, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
James A VanDerslicePublic Health, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are substantial challenges in studying human transgenerational epigenetic outcomes resulting from environmental conditions. The task requires specialized methods and tools that incorporate specific knowledge of multigenerational relationship combinations of probands and their ancestors, phenotype data for individuals, environmental information of ancestors and their descendants, which can span historical to present datasets, and informative environmental data that chronologically aligns with ancestors and descendants over space and time. As a result, there are few epidemiologic studies of potential transgenerational effects in human populations, thus limiting the knowledge of ancestral environmental conditions and the potential impacts we face with modern human health outcomes. In an effort to overcome some of the challenges in studying human transgenerational effects, we present two transgenerational study designs: transgenerational space-time cluster detection and transgenerational case-control study design. Like other epidemiological methods, these methods determine whether there are statistical associations between phenotypic outcomes (e.g., adverse health outcomes) among probands and the shared environments and environmental factors facing their ancestors. When the ancestor is a paternal grandparent, a statistically significant association provides some evidence that a transgenerational inheritable factor may be involved. Such results may generate useful hypotheses that can be explored using epigenomic data to establish conclusive evidence of transgenerational heritable effects. Both methods are proband-centric: They are designed around the phenotype of interest in the proband generation for case selection and family pedigree creation. In the examples provided, we incorporate at least three generations of paternal lineage in both methods to observe a potential transgenerational effect.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticCase-Control StudiesFemaleGene-Environment InteractionHumansMalePhenotypecase-control studyspace-time cluster detectionTransgenerational

Identifiers

PMID38870389
PMCPMC11178273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.