Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38870162›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Health workforce for oral health inequity: Opportunity for action.

Jennifer E Gallagher, Grazielle C Mattos Savage, Sarah C Crummey, Wael Sabbah, Yuka Makino, Benoit Varenne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Image Behind the Algorithm.European journal of dentistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Prevent, Promote, PromulgateChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer E GallagherDental Public Health, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Denmark Hill Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5068-8008
Grazielle C Mattos SavageDental Public Health, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Denmark Hill Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah C CrummeyDental Public Health, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Denmark Hill Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Wael SabbahDental Public Health, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Denmark Hill Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Yuka MakinoNoncommunicable Diseases Management Team, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Cité Djoué, Brazzaville, Congo.
Benoit VarenneWHO Oral Health Programme, Noncommunicable Diseases Department | Division of Universal Health Coverage & Communicable and Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral health is high on the global agenda following the adoption of the 2022 global strategy on oral health at the 75th World Health Assembly. Given the global burden of oral disease, workforce development to achieve universal health coverage [UHC] is crucial to respond to population needs within the non-communicable disease agenda. The aim of this paper is to present an overview of the oral health workforce [OHWF] globally in relation to key contextual factors. Data from the National Health Workforce Accounts and a survey of World Health Organization [WHO] member states were integrated for analysis, together with country-level data on population and income status. Data are presented using the WHO categorisation of global regions and income status categories established by the World Bank. Workforce densities for key OHWF categories were examined. Multiple regression was used to model workforce density and contextual influences. Challenges and possible solutions were examined by country income status. There are approximately 3.30 dentists per 10,000 population globally, and a combined OHWF [dentists, dental assistants/therapists and dental prosthetic technicians] of 5.31 per 10,000. Marked regional inequalities are evident, most notably between WHO European and African regions; yet both make greater use of skill mix than other regions. When adjusted by region, 'country income status' and 'population urbanization' are strong predictors of the workforce density of dentists and even more so for the combined OHWF. Maldistribution of the workforce [urban/rural] was considered a particular workforce challenge globally and especially for lower-income countries. Strengthening oral health policy was considered most important for the future. The global distribution of dentists, and the OHWF generally, is inequitable, with variable and limited use of skill mix. Creative workforce development is required to achieve the global oral health agenda and work towards equity using innovative models of care, supported by effective governance and integrated policies.

Indexed as

Global HealthHealth WorkforceOral HealthDentistsHealth InequitiesHumansWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID38870162
PMCPMC11175420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.