ArticlePloS one2024
Novel real number representations in Ising machines and performance evaluation: Combinatorial random number sum and constant division.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formulation and evaluation of ocean dynamics problems as optimization problems for quantum annealing machines.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development of optimization method for truss structure by quantum annealing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantum annealing machines are next-generation computers for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Although physical simulations are one of the most promising applications of quantum annealing machines, a method how to embed the target problem into the machines has not been developed except for certain simple examples. In this study, we focus on a method of representing real numbers using binary variables, or quantum bits. One of the most important problems for conducting physical simulation by quantum annealing machines is how to represent the real number with quantum bits. The variables in physical simulations are often represented by real numbers but real numbers must be represented by a combination of binary variables in quantum annealing, such as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO). Conventionally, real numbers have been represented by assigning each digit of their binary number representation to a binary variable. Considering the classical annealing point of view, we noticed that when real numbers are represented in binary numbers, there are numbers that can only be reached by inverting several bits simultaneously under the restriction of not increasing a given Hamiltonian, which makes the optimization very difficult. In this work, we propose three new types of real number representation and compared these representations under the problem of solving linear equations. As a result, we found experimentally that the accuracy of the solution varies significantly depending on how the real numbers are represented. We also found that the most appropriate representation depends on the size and difficulty of the problem to be solved and that these differences show a consistent trend for two annealing solvers. Finally, we explain the reasons for these differences using simple models, the minimum required number of simultaneous bit flips, one-way probabilistic bit-flip energy minimization, and simulation of ideal quantum annealing machine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.