ArticlePloS one2024
Unsupervised model for structure segmentation applied to brain computed tomography.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents an unsupervised method for segmenting brain computed tomography scans. The proposed methodology involves image feature extraction and application of similarity and continuity constraints to generate segmentation maps of the anatomical head structures. Specifically designed for real-world datasets, this approach applies a spatial continuity scoring function tailored to the desired number of structures. The primary objective is to assist medical experts in diagnosis by identifying regions with specific abnormalities. Results indicate a simplified and accessible solution, reducing computational effort, training time, and financial costs. Moreover, the method presents potential for expediting the interpretation of abnormal scans, thereby impacting clinical practice. This proposed approach might serve as a practical tool for segmenting brain computed tomography scans, and make a significant contribution to the analysis of medical images in both research and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.