Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38870072›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2024

Assessment of serum tumor markers CEA, CA-125, and CA19-9 as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer management.

Scott Strum, Mark Vincent, Meghan Gipson, Eric McArthur, Daniel Breadner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott StrumDepartment of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON, Canada.
Mark VincentDepartment of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON, Canada.
Meghan GipsonDepartment of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Eric McArthurLondon Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Daniel BreadnerDepartment of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional tumor markers may serve as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. This study analyzed whether three tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA-125) held associations with radiographic and clinical outcomes in NSCLC. It constituted a single-center study of NSCLC patients treated with systemic therapy at the London Regional Cancer Program. Serum tumor markers were analyzed for differences in radiographic responses (RECIST v1.1 or iRECIST), associations with clinical characteristics, and all-cause mortality. A total of 533 NSCLC patients were screened, of which 165 met inclusion criteria. A subset of 92 patients had paired tumor markers and radiographic scans. From the latter population, median (IQR) fold-change from nadir to progression was 2.13 (IQR 1.24-3.02;

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic Antigenbiomarkerlung cancerNSCLCtranslational researchtumor marker

Identifiers

PMID38870072
PMCPMC11174826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.