Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38869823›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2025

Assessing the impact of positive cultures in preservation fluid on renal transplant outcomes: a scoping review.

Fabiani P Machado, Alessandra R Vicari, Andrea C Bauer

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabiani P MachadoUniversidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2.350 Largo Eduardo Zaccaro Faraco, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil. f_palagimachado@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-0891
Alessandra R VicariUniversidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2.350 Largo Eduardo Zaccaro Faraco, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-152X
Andrea C BauerUniversidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2.350 Largo Eduardo Zaccaro Faraco, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5041-4792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection following kidney transplantation is a significant risk factor for adverse outcomes. While the donor may be a source of infection, microbiological assessment of the preservation fluid (PF) can mitigate potential recipient contamination and help curb unnecessary antibiotic use. This scoping review aimed to describe the available literature on the association between culture-positive preservation fluid, its clinically relevant outcomes, and management.

methodsFollowing the Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review recommendations, a comprehensive search in databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and gray literature) was conducted, with data independently extracted by two researchers from selected studies.

resultsWe analysed 24 articles involving 12,052 samples, predominantly published post-2000, 91% of which retrospective. The prevalence of culture-positive preservation fluid varied from 0.86 to 77.8%. Coagulase-negative staphylococci emerged as the most frequently isolated pathogen in 14 studies. The presence of ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species), observed in two studies involving 1074 donors, was significantly associated with an increased risk of probable donor-derived infections (p-DDI). Of the reviewed articles, 14 reported on probable donor-derived infections, while 19 addressed the topic of preemptive antibiotic therapy.

conclusionsRoutine culturing of preservation fluid is crucial for the identification of pathogenic organisms, facilitates targeted treatment and prevents probable donor-derived infections. Furthermore, this approach helps avoid the treatment of low-virulence contaminants, thereby reducing unnecessary antimicrobial use and the risk of antibiotic resistance. In cases where ESKAPE or Candida species are detected, preemptive therapy appears to be an important strategy. Given that the current evidence primarily stems from retrospective studies, there is a pressing need for large-scale, prospective trials to corroborate these recommendations. This scoping review currently represents the most thorough compilation of evidence on how contamination of preservation fluids affects kidney transplant management.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsKidney TransplantationOrgan PreservationOrgan Preservation SolutionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsOrgan Preservation SolutionsInfectionKidney transplantPreemptive treatmentPreservation fluid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.