ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Functional Characterization and Localization of Plant-Growth Promoting Bacteria Grown Under Stressful Conditions.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various bacterial species are associated with plant roots. However, symbiotic and free-living plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) can only help plants to grow and develop under normal and stressful conditions. Several biochemical and in vitro assays were previously designed to differentiate between the PGPB and other plant-associated bacterial strains. This chapter describes and summarizes some of these assays and proposes a strategy to screen for PGPB. To determine the involvement of the PGPB in abiotic stress tolerance, assays for the ability to produce 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase, ammonium, gibberellic acid (GA), indole acetic acid (IAA), and microbial volatile organic compounds (mVOCs) are described in this chapter. Additionally, assays to show the capacity to solubilize micronutrients such as potassium, phosphorus, and zinc by bacteria were also summarized in this chapter. To determine the contribution of the PGPB in biotic stress tolerance in plants, Fe-siderophore, hydrogen cyanide, and antibiotic and antifungal metabolites production assays were described. Moreover, assays to investigate the growth-promotion activities of a bacterium strain on plants, using the gnotobiotic root elongation, in vitro, and pots assays, were explained. Finally, an assay for the localization of endophytic bacterium in plant tissues was also presented in this chapter. Although the assays described in this chapter can give evidence of the nature of the mechanism behind the PGPB actions, other unknown growth-promoting means are yet to decipher, and until then, new methodologies will be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38869802What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.