ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Patient-specific reference model estimation for orthognathic surgical planning.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generating 3D pseudo-healthy knee MR images to support trochleoplasty planning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- [Establishment and evaluation of a similarity measurement model for orthognathic patients based on the 3D craniofacial features].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate estimation of reference bony shape models is fundamental for orthognathic surgical planning. Existing methods to derive this model are of two types: one determines the reference model by estimating the deformation field to correct the patient's deformed jaw, often introducing distortions in the predicted reference model; The other derives the reference model using a linear combination of their landmarks/vertices but overlooks the intricate nonlinear relationship between the subjects, compromising the model's precision and quality.
methodsWe have created a self-supervised learning framework to estimate the reference model. The core of this framework is a deep query network, which estimates the similarity scores between the patient's midface and those of the normal subjects in a high-dimensional space. Subsequently, it aggregates high-dimensional features of these subjects and projects these features back to 3D structures, ultimately achieving a patient-specific reference model.
resultsOur approach was trained using a dataset of 51 normal subjects and tested on 30 patient subjects to estimate their reference models. Performance assessment against the actual post-operative bone revealed a mean Chamfer distance error of 2.25 mm and an average surface distance error of 2.30 mm across the patient subjects.
conclusionOur proposed method emphasizes the correlation between the patients and the normal subjects in a high-dimensional space, facilitating the generation of the patient-specific reference model. Both qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate its superiority over current state-of-the-art methods in reference model estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.