Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38869623›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

A theoretical explanation for how a nutrition counseling and medically tailored meal delivery program benefitted participants living with lung cancer.

Pamela Rothpletz-Puglia, Jade Smith, Chloe Pavuk, Jana Leotta, Kimberli Pike, Carolyn J Presley, Jessica L Krok-Schoen, Ashlea Braun, Mary Kathryn Cohen, Gail T Rogers and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pamela Rothpletz-PugliaRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, School of Health Professions, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jade SmithSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Medical Dietetics, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Chloe PavukSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Medical Dietetics, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jana LeottaSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Medical Dietetics, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kimberli PikeRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, School of Health Professions, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Carolyn J PresleyThe James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jessica L Krok-SchoenThe James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ashlea BraunTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Mary Kathryn CohenFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Gail T RogersFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenneth Kwan Ho ChuiDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Fang Fang ZhangFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Colleen K SpeesSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Medical Dietetics, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. spees.11@osu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess participants' perceptions and experiences while participating in a Food is Medicine medically tailored meal plus intensive nutrition counseling intervention to create a theoretical explanation about how the intervention worked.

methodsThis interpretive qualitative study included the use of semi-structured interviews with active participants in a randomized controlled trial aimed at understanding how a medically tailored meal plus nutrition counseling intervention worked for vulnerable individuals with lung cancer treated at four cancer centers across the USA. During the 8-month long study, participants in the intervention arm were asked to be interviewed, which were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using conventional content analysis with principles of grounded theory.

resultsTwenty individuals participated. Data analysis resulted in a theoretical explanation of the intervention's mechanism of action. The explanatory process includes three linked and propositional categories leading to patient resilience: engaging in treatment, adjusting to diagnosis, and active coping. The medically tailored meals plus nutrition counseling engaged participants throughout treatment, which helped participants adjust to their diagnosis, leading to active coping through intentional self-care, behavior change, and improved quality of life.

conclusionsThese findings provide evidence that a Food is Medicine intervention may buffer some of the adversity related to the diagnosis of lung cancer and create a pathway for participants to experience post-traumatic growth, develop resilience, and change behaviors to actively cope with lung cancer. Medically tailored meals plus intensive nutrition counseling informed by motivational interviewing supported individuals' adjustment to their diagnosis and resulted in perceived positive behavior change.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCounselingLung NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchAgedFemaleHumansMaleMealsMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSelf CareActive copingFood is MedicineLung cancerMedically tailored mealsMedical nutrition therapyMotivational interviewingNutrition interventionNutrition securityPost-traumatic growthQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38869623
PMCPMC11176247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.