Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38869357›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Hazard Perception in Visually Impaired Drivers Who Use Bioptic Telescopes.

Rebecca A Deffler, San-San L Cooley, Halea A Kohl, Thomas W Raasch, Bradley E Dougherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca A DefflerCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
San-San L CooleyCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Halea A KohlCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Thomas W RaaschCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Bradley E DoughertyCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Short Term Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35EY007151 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Heather Anne Anderson · 1998 to 2026
$1.2M
Vision Science Training ProgramT32EY034824 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Heather Anne Anderson · 2023 to 2026
$595k
NEI NIH HHS T32 EY034824NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Bioptic telescopic spectacles can allow individuals with central vision impairment to obtain or maintain driving privileges. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare hazard perception ability among bioptic drivers and traditionally licensed controls, (2) assess the impact of bioptic telescopic spectacles on hazard perception in drivers with vision impairment, and (3) analyze the relationships among vision and hazard detection in bioptic drivers. Methods: Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and visual field were measured for each participant. All drivers completed the Driving Habits Questionnaire. Hazard perception testing was conducted using commercially available first-person video driving clips. Subjects signaled when they could first identify a traffic hazard requiring a change of speed or direction. Bioptic drivers were tested with and without their bioptic telescopes in alternating blocks. Hazard detection times for each clip were converted to z-scores, converted back to seconds using the average response time across all videos, and then compared among conditions. Results: Twenty-one bioptic drivers and 21 normally sighted controls participated in the study. The hazard response time of bioptic drivers was improved when able to use the telescope (5.4 ± 1.4 seconds vs 6.3 ± 1.8 seconds without telescope); however, it remained significantly longer than for controls (4.0 ± 1.4 seconds). Poorer visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and superior visual field sensitivity loss were related to longer hazard response times. Conclusions: Drivers with central vision loss had improved hazard response times with the use of bioptic telescopic spectacles, although their responses were still slower than normally sighted control drivers. Translational Relevance: The use of a bioptic telescope by licensed, visually impaired drivers improves their hazard detection speed on a video-based task, lending support to their use on the road.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingContrast SensitivityTelescopesVisual AcuityAccidents, TrafficAdultAgedEyeglassesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with Visual DisabilitiesReaction TimeSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID38869357
PMCPMC11178119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.