Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38869255›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2024

Expert consensus statements and summary of proceedings from the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition Summit.

Phil Ayers, Mette M Berger, David Berlana, Sarah V Cogle, Joeri De Cloet, Brenda Gray, Stanislaw Klek, Vanessa J Kumpf, Jessica Monczka, Joe Ybarra and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  5. International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition Summit: Introduction.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  6. Parenteral nutrition in the hospital setting/short-term parenteral nutrition.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  7. Safety and quality of parenteral nutrition: Areas for improvement and future perspectives.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  8. Parenteral nutrition in clinical practice: International challenges and strategies.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Review
  9. Parenteral nutrition at home/long-term parenteral nutrition.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Phil AyersClinical Pharmacy Services, Department of Pharmacy, Baptist Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Mette M BergerService of Adult Intensive Care, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
David BerlanaPharmacy Service, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus and Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sarah V CogleDepartment of Pharmacy, Clinical Programs, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Joeri De CloetPharmacy Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Brenda GrayClinical Pharmacy Partners, Tampa, FL, USA.
Stanislaw KlekSurgical Oncology Clinic, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Cancer Institute, Krakow, Poland.
Vanessa J KumpfCenter for Human Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jessica MonczkaOption Care Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Joe YbarraSteward Health Care, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sarah ZeraschiPharmacy Department and Nutrition and Intestinal Failure Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Paul E WischmeyerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit consisted of presentations, discussions, and formulation of consensus statements. The purpose here is to briefly summarize the summit and to present the consensus statements. SUMMARY: There was a high degree of consensus, with all statements approved by all authors/summit experts. These consensus statements should be regarded not as formal guidelines but rather as best-practice guidance intended to complement national and international nutrition society evidence-based guidelines and position statements. This article also summarizes key discussion topics from the summit, encompassing up-to-date knowledge and practical guidance concerning PN safety and quality in various countries and clinical settings, focusing on adult patients. Clear geographical differences exist between practices in Europe and the United States, and different approaches to improve the safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness of PN vary, particularly with regard to the delivery systems used. Discussion between experts allowed for an exchange of practical experience in optimizing PN use processes, opportunities for standardization, use of electronic systems, potential improvements in PN formulations, better management during PN component shortages, and practical guidance to address patients' needs, particularly during long-term/home PN.

conclusionThe consensus statements are the collective opinion of the panel members and form best-practice guidance. The authors intend that this guidance may help to improve the safety and quality of PN in a variety of settings by bridging the gap between published guideline recommendations and common practical issues.

Indexed as

Parenteral NutritionHumansPatient Safetyconsensusformulationparenteral nutritionsafety

Identifiers

PMID38869255
PMCPMC11170495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.