Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38869242›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Use of simulation to optimize a sweet corn breeding program: implementing genomic selection and doubled haploid technology.

Marco Antônio Peixoto, Igor Ferreira Coelho, Kristen A Leach, Thomas Lübberstedt, Leonardo Lopes Bhering, Márcio F R Resende

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Association mapping of haploid male fertility in sweet corn.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco Antônio PeixotoLaboratório de Biometria, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais 36570-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0564-7068
Igor Ferreira CoelhoLaboratório de Biometria, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais 36570-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0650-5416
Kristen A LeachSweet Corn Breeding and Genomics Lab, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Thomas LübberstedtDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0526-0798
Leonardo Lopes BheringLaboratório de Biometria, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais 36570-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6072-0996
Márcio F R ResendeSweet Corn Breeding and Genomics Lab, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2367-0766

Funding

AFRI 2019-05410Brazilian GovernmentCAPESCAPES-PrInt scholarshipCoordination for the Improvement of Higher Education PersonnelNational Council for Scientific and Technological DevelopmentNational Institute of Food and AgricultureSCRI 2018-51181-28419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection and doubled haploids hold significant potential to enhance genetic gains and shorten breeding cycles across various crops. Here, we utilized stochastic simulations to investigate the best strategies for optimize a sweet corn breeding program. We assessed the effects of incorporating varying proportions of old and new parents into the crossing block (3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and 0:1 ratio, representing different degrees of parental substitution), as well as the implementation of genomic selection in two distinct pipelines: one calibrated using the phenotypes of testcross parents (GSTC scenario) and another using F1 individuals (GSF1). Additionally, we examined scenarios with doubled haploids, both with (DH) and without (DHGS) genomic selection. Across 20 years of simulated breeding, we evaluated scenarios considering traits with varying heritabilities, the presence or absence of genotype-by-environment effects, and two program sizes (50 vs 200 crosses per generation). We also assessed parameters such as parental genetic mean, average genetic variance, hybrid mean, and implementation costs for each scenario. Results indicated that within a conventional selection program, a 1:3 parental substitution ratio (replacing 75% of parents each generation with new lines) yielded the highest performance. Furthermore, the GSTC model outperformed the GSF1 model in enhancing genetic gain. The DHGS model emerged as the most effective, reducing cycle time from 5 to 4 years and enhancing hybrid gains despite increased costs. In conclusion, our findings strongly advocate for the integration of genomic selection and doubled haploids into sweet corn breeding programs, offering accelerated genetic gains and efficiency improvements.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHaploidyModels, GeneticPlant BreedingSelection, GeneticZea maysGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypePhenotypebreeding analyticsbreeding program designhybrid performancestochastic simulationvegetable breeding

Identifiers

PMID38869242
PMCPMC11304600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.