ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2024
The effect of dienogest treatment on anti-Mullerian hormone in patients with endometrioma: a 12-month follow-up study.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Therapeutic Role of Dienogest in Endometriosis-Associated Pain: From Basics to Clinics.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of dienogest treatment on endometrioma (OMA) size, serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and associated pain over a 12-month follow-up period. Material and Methods: A longitudinal cohort study of 104 patients with OMA who were treated with dienogest, between January 2017 and January 2020. Of the included patients, each had a 12-month follow-up period with transvaginal or pelvic ultrasound and measurement of serum AMH concentration at the sixth and twelfth months of follow-up. The alteration in OMA size in the sixth and twelfth months of treatment was the primary outcome measure and the alteration in AMH concentration over the same period was the secondary outcome measure. The only exclusion criterion was having surgical intervention for OMA during the follow-up period (n=44). In patients with bilateral OMA (n=21), the change in size of the largest OMA was considered in the analysis. Results: A total of 60 patients with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 31.5±8.0 years were included. The mean ± SD OMA size on the day the dienogest was started was 46.3±17.4 mm and the mean AMH level was 3.6±2.4 ng/mL. After six months, the mean OMA size had decreased to 38.6±14.0 mm, with a median difference of 7.8 mm [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.0 to 12.6; p=0.003]. The mean AMH level was 3.3±2.7 ng/mL at 6 months follow-up (95% CI: -0.2 to 0.8; p=0.23) and the average difference was 0.3 ng/mL. At the 12 Conclusion: At the sixth and twelfth months of dienogest treatment a significant decrease in OMA size and reported pain scores were observed, whereas the AMH concentrations did not change significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.