ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2024
The Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Frontal QRS-T Angle in Psychiatric Patients.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the biological therapies that is well tolerated and has a low risk of complications. Acute cardiovascular complications related to ECT such as ventricular arrhythmia, myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest have been recorded. Increased frontal QRS-T (fQRS-T) angle was associated with ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death and total mortality. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of ECT on the myocardium using electrocardiography (ECG) parameters such as fQRS-T angle, QRS duration, QT and QTc interval. Methods: A total of 108 patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder (n=36), depressive disorder (n=70) and schizophrenia (n=2) who underwent ECT were included in this study. 12-lead surface ECG of all patients were taken before the ECT, 15 min. after ECT and 24 hour after ECT. Results: QRS duration, QT interval and corrected QT (QTc) interval were not changed significantly during the follow-up period. However, we found that, fQRS-T angle was significantly increased 15 minutes after ECT compared to baseline angle (p<0.001). We also detected that this increase in fQRS-T angle 15 minutes after ECT was significantly reduced 24 hours after ECT (p=0.031). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between baseline and 24th hour fQRS-T angle (p=0.154). Conclusions: In our study, a significant increase in fQRS-T angle was observed 15 min after ECT. However, the fQRS-T angle was found to return to normal after 24 hours. Our findings may indicate that ECT does not have a permanent side effect on the risk of cardiovascular events according to the fQRS-T angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.