Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868709›Full record

ArticleiMeta2022

Biochar stimulates tomato roots to recruit a bacterial assemblage contributing to disease resistance against

Xue Jin, Yang Bai, Muhammad Khashi U Rahman, Xiaojun Kang, Kai Pan, Fengzhi Wu, Thomas Pommier, Xingang Zhou, Zhong Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iMeta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Solanaceous vegetables andHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xue JinKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Department of Horticulture Northeast Agricultural University Harbin China.
Yang BaiKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Department of Horticulture Northeast Agricultural University Harbin China.
Muhammad Khashi U RahmanKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Department of Horticulture Northeast Agricultural University Harbin China.
Xiaojun KangDepartment of Plant & Microbial Biology University of Minnesota Saint Paul Minnesota USA.
Kai PanKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Department of Horticulture Northeast Agricultural University Harbin China.
Fengzhi WuKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Department of Horticulture Northeast Agricultural University Harbin China.
Thomas PommierUniv Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Ecologie Microbienne Villeurbanne France.
Xingang ZhouKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Department of Horticulture Northeast Agricultural University Harbin China.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-7177
Zhong WeiJiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Laboratory of Bio-interactions and Crop Health, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-based Fertilizers, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization Nanjing Agricultural University Nanjing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochar amendment is acknowledged to favor plant resistance against soil-borne diseases. Although plant-beneficial bacteria enrichment in the rhizosphere is often proposed to be associated with this protection, the mechanism behind this stimulating effect remains unelucidated. Here, we tested whether biochar promotes plants to recruit beneficial bacteria to the rhizosphere, and thus develop a disease-suppressive rhizosphere microbiome. In a pot experiment, biochar amendment decreased tomato

Indexed as

bacterial diversitydisease suppressionFusarium wiltmicrobiome recruitment

Identifiers

PMID38868709
PMCPMC10989760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.