Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868693›Full record

ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2022

Young carers in Japan: Reliability and validity testing of the BBC/University of Nottingham young carers survey questionnaire and prevalence estimation in 5000 adolescents.

Akiko Kanehara, Ryo Morishima, Yusuke Takahashi, Haruna Koike, Kaori Usui, Shun-Ichi Sato, Akito Uno, Yutaka Sawai, Yousuke Kumakura, Sho Yagishita and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Young carer knowledge scale: Development, validation, and implications for support.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Akiko KaneharaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Ryo MorishimaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yusuke TakahashiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Haruna KoikeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Kaori UsuiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Shun-Ichi SatoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Akito UnoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yutaka SawaiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yousuke KumakuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Sho YagishitaDepartment of Structural Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Satoshi UsamiGraduate School of Education The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Masaya MoritaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Kentaro MoritaDepartment of Rehabilitation The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0490-5013
Sho KanataDepartment of Psychiatry Teikyo University Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Naohiro OkadaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8338-2758
Syudo YamasakiResearch Center for Social Science & Medicine Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science Tokyo Japan.
Atsushi NishidaResearch Center for Social Science & Medicine Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science Tokyo Japan.
Shuntaro AndoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Shinsuke KoikeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Tomoko ShibuyaFaculty of Humanities Seikei University Tokyo Japan.
Stephen JosephSchool of Education University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.
Kiyoto KasaiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-4535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Young carers (YCs) refer to children under the age of 18 who assume responsibilities that would normally be assumed by adults, such as caring for family members in need of care. In recent years, the concept of YCs has been expanding in Japan, and the government has been rapidly implementing strategies to support them. There is a need for a survey scale for YCs that uses standardized methods that can be compared internationally. Method: The BBC/University of Nottingham Survey for estimating the prevalence of YCs and caring activities of United Kingdom adolescents was translated into Japanese, and its reliability and validity were tested with 313 adolescents. Moreover, the prevalence of YCs was estimated in a school-based survey among 5000 adolescents. Results: The Young Carers Scale Japanese version (YCS-J) was acceptably reliable and valid. The original six-factor model for caring activity in the Multidimensional Assessment of Caring Activities Checklist for Young Carers (MACA-YC18) was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. The prevalence of YCs among 5000 adolescents in the Tokyo metropolitan area was estimated to be 7.4%, comparable to that reported in Western countries and in recent surveys in Japan using nonstandardized methods. YCs exhibited significantly higher scores for prosocial behavior and emotional symptoms than non-YCs. Conclusions: The YCS-J, as an internationally comparable instrument, will be useful for understanding the actual situation of YCs in Japan, and to disseminate and implement support through cooperation among education, welfare, and healthcare sectors.

Indexed as

Japanprevalencereliabilityvalidityyoung carers

Identifiers

PMID38868693
PMCPMC11114284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.