ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2022
Decision aid development and its acceptability among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders regarding treatment discontinuation after remission.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re-evaluating age-related attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom trajectories using the Japanese ADHD Rating Scale-5.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Decision aid development and its acceptability among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders regarding treatment discontinuation after remission.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2022Article
- Supporting Decision Making on ADHD Medication: Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid for Parents.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Current clinical guidelines for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) put shared decision making (SDM) at the center of care. However, there remain challenges in SDM in ADHD management, particularly regarding the decision to continue or discontinue medication after ADHD remission in adult patients. We aimed to develop a decision aid (DA) for adult patients with ADHD regarding the continuation or discontinuation of their ongoing ADHD medications after they have attained remission. Method: We systematically developed a DA according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standard (IPDAS). First, we created a DA prototype using the results of our previous systematic review and meta-analysis that identified the consequences of continuing and discontinuing ADHD medications. Second, we administered a mixed-method questionnaire (alpha acceptability testing) to adult patients with ADHD and healthcare providers to improve the DA prototype and develop it into a final version that is acceptable for clinical settings. Results: Our DA consisted of ADHD description, the option to continue or discontinue ADHD medications, the advantages and disadvantages of the consequences, as well as value clarification exercises for each option. Patients ( Conclusions: Our results could facilitate the SDM process between patients and healthcare providers on the continuation or discontinuation of ADHD medication following remission. Further studies should verify the effects of using the DA during the SDM process among patients across the age spectrum with ADHD and healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.