ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2022
Association between meal frequency with others and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluctuations in Mediterranean Diet Adherence Pre- and Post-Pandemic: A Study of Portuguese Cohorts 2019-2024.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Association between meal frequency with others and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Previous studies evaluated the association between eating alone and mental health mainly in older people and adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dinner frequency with others and psychological distress during the COVID-19 outbreak among the Japanese working population. Methods: Data were acquired from a prospective online cohort study (the Employee Cohort Study in the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan) conducted in February 2021 as a cross-sectional design. Dinner frequency with others was categorized into five groups: "almost daily," "4-5 times per week," "2-3 times per week," "once per week," and "less than once per week," setting them as a predictor variable. Modified Poisson regression was performed to calculate the prevalence ratio of psychological distress with multiple imputation for missing data. Global fear and worry about COVID-19 were adjusted as a covariate. Results: A total of 1171 participants completed the questionnaire. Respondents who ate dinner with others "almost daily" had the least psychological distress than those who ate with others "4-5 times," "2-3 times," and "once per week" in the crude model (prevalence ratio (95% CI): 1 [reference], 1.34 [1.08-1.67], 1.40 [1.15-1.69], 1.44 [1.12-1.85], respectively). The association was comparable after adjusting for global fear and worry about COVID-19. Conclusions: Among those who ate dinner with others at least once a week, those who ate with others "almost daily" had the least psychological distress. The association was comparable after adjusting for global fear and worry about COVID-19. Further study is needed on why those who eat with others less than once a week may have a lower prevalence ratio of having mental distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.