ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
JOLT: A Noninvasive Solution for the Correction of the Jowl.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative Analysis of Age-Related Changes in the Lower Face.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sagging and loss of elasticity of the facial skin and tissues leads to jowling and an aged appearance. Jowling is a common reason for aesthetic surgical consultations. Methods: Prospective open-label study of the JOLT (jowl lifting) technique using hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers in healthy women 40-65 years of age with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes II-IV (n = 8). To be eligible, patients had jowling grade 2-3 on the jowl appearance scale as assessed by both the physician and patient. Treatment was administered at the baseline visit and consisted of an average of 6 mL of HA filler, 3 mL per side. Efficacy was assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 12. Assessment measures included the jawline rating scale (JRS) and a five-point global aesthetic improvement scale performed by two independent observers. Success was defined as an improvement of 1-2 grades on JRS. Results: The mean JRS was improved from 2.75 at baseline to 1.53 at 90 days, which was considered a significant improvement. Mean global aesthetic improvement scale scores at 90 days were 1.44 ± 0.66 (range 1-3), indicating a "very much improved" appearance compared with baseline on both investigator and subject ratings. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients. Injection-related side effects (bruising and localized swelling) resolved spontaneously within 1 week of treatment. No other adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The JOLT technique effectively uses HA fillers to lift and tighten the lower face/neck and camouflage the remaining jowl, diminishing marionette lines, defining the mandibular border, and improving jowl sagging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.