Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868562›Full record

ArticleRespirology case reports2024

Bronchial occlusion with endobronchial Watanabe spigots using a two-scope technique for massive haemoptysis.

Tomoya Baba, Takayasu Ito, Yoshiki Sato, Shunsaku Hayai, Junji Koyama, Shota Nakamura, Yoshiyuki Tokuda, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa, Makoto Ishii

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Respirology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tomoya BabaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Takayasu ItoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1108-1574
Yoshiki SatoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Shunsaku HayaiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Junji KoyamaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Shota NakamuraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Yoshiyuki TokudaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-YoshikawaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Makoto IshiiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massive haemoptysis is a life-threatening condition whose cause needs to be identified rapidly so that prompt interventions can ensue. Bronchial occlusion with endobronchial Watanabe spigots (EWSs) may be useful when endovascular treatment or surgery proves to be difficult. An 84-year-old woman developed massive haemoptysis during percutaneous mitral valve repair for refractory heart failure due to severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Interventional radiology (IVR) and surgery were contraindicated, and bronchial occlusion with EWSs was attempted to control bleeding. The bleeding was so persistent that it was difficult to secure the visual field without aspiration with a bronchoscope. Herein, we report a two-scope technique, also used in cryobiopsy of peripheral lung lesions, to control bleeding and perform bronchial occlusion with EWSs.

Indexed as

bronchial occlusionendobronchial Watanabe spigotmassive haemoptysistwo‐scope technique

Identifiers

PMID38868562
PMCPMC11167016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.