Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868560›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of social research methodology2024

'For Want of a Nail': developing a transparent approach to retroduction and early initial programme theory development in a realist evaluation of community end of life care services.

Kathryn McEwan, Melissa Girling, Angela Bate, Joanne Atkinson, Amanda Clarke, Sonia Dalkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of social research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathryn McEwanDept of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4063-035X
Melissa GirlingDept of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-5262
Angela BateDept of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-4188
Joanne AtkinsonDept of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-0110
Amanda ClarkeDept of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5701-7733
Sonia DalkinDept of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3266-5926

Funding

Marie Curie MC-19-903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial part of theory-driven realist thinking is retroduction, the process of looking backwards for explanation of how and why things may be. Conducted early in the realist evaluation process, it provides a foundation for evidenced 'theory gleaning'. Despite retroduction being an inherent part of the realist process, it is often 'hidden' in realist reports. This paper explains the thinking behind, alongside an example of, a framework created by the authors to make transparent the retroductive process as used in a realist evaluation of two community End of Life Care services. The approach makes visible the application of the 'sociological imagination' and lends robustness to hypotheses by establishing how the authors utilised: wide-ranging potential generative causation; stakeholder and Patient and Public Involvement feedback; literature scoping; and substantive theories at the middle range, specifically Transitions Theory. These stages led to the development of Initial Programme Theories, with a clear history of genesis.

Indexed as

end of life careRealist evaluationrealist methodologyretroductiontransitions theory

Identifiers

PMID38868560
PMCPMC11166047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.