Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868558›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental politics2024

Like diamonds in the sky? Public perceptions, governance, and information framing of solar geoengineering activities in Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Chad M Baum, Livia Fritz, Sean Low, Benjamin K Sovacool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental politics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chad M BaumDepartment of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6684-7747
Livia FritzDepartment of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-2193
Sean LowDepartment of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-5964
Benjamin K SovacoolDepartment of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solar geoengineering (also known as solar radiation modification) is garnering more attention (and controversy) among media and policymakers in response to the impacts of climate change. Such debates have become more prominent following the first-ever field trials of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in 2022. How the lay public perceives solar geoengineering remains unclear, however. We use nationally representative samples (

Indexed as

Climate changeGlobal Southgovernancepublic perceptionsolar geoengineeringstratospheric aerosol injection

Identifiers

PMID38868558
PMCPMC11166051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.