ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2024
Validation and three years of clinical experience in using an artificial intelligence algorithm as a second read system for prostate cancer diagnosis-real-world experience.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for detection, grading, and prognostication in prostate cancer pathology: A scoping review.Histology and histopathology · 2026Article
- Regulatory science for AI-basedJournal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Validation, implementation, and impact of an AI model in routine practice for pathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer in an academic medical center.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Retrospective Validation of a Resource-Aware Assistive AI Tool for Screening Prostate Needle Biopsies and Classifying Prostate Adenocarcinoma into ISUP Grade Groups.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in small tissue biopsies: diagnostic applications, histochemical integration, and methodological challenges in surgical pathology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Translational AI in whole-slide image cancer histopathology: state of the art and regulatory-approved solutions.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven digital pathology in urological cancers: current trends and future directions.Prostate international · 2025Review
- Bladder Washing Cytology in the Detection of High-Grade Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Toward Optimizing the Impact of Digital Pathology and Augmented Intelligence on Issues of Diagnosis, Grading, Staging, and Classification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025Review
- Implementing 100% quality control in a cervical cytology workflow using whole slide images and artificial intelligence provided by the Techcyte SureView™ System.Cancer cytopathology · 2025Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Evaluation of Prostate Pathology.Pathology international · 2025Review
- Recent Advances and Perspectives in Anesthesiology: Towards Artificial Intelligence-Based Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer ranks as the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in the USA, with significant mortality rates. Early detection is pivotal for optimal patient outcomes, providing increased treatment options and potentially less invasive interventions. There remain significant challenges in prostate cancer histopathology, including the potential for missed diagnoses due to pathologist variability and subjective interpretations. Methods: To address these challenges, this study investigates the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance diagnostic accuracy. The Galen™ Prostate AI algorithm was validated on a cohort of Puerto Rican men to demonstrate its efficacy in cancer detection and Gleason grading. Subsequently, the AI algorithm was integrated into routine clinical practice during a 3-year period at a CLIA certified precision pathology laboratory. Results: The Galen™ Prostate AI algorithm showed a 96.7% (95% CI 95.6-97.8) specificity and a 96.6% (95% CI 93.3-98.8) sensitivity for prostate cancer detection and 82.1% specificity (95% CI 73.9-88.5) and 81.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.7-87.2) for distinction of Gleason Grade Group 1 from Grade Group 2+. The subsequent AI integration into routine clinical use examined prostate cancer diagnoses on >122,000 slides and 9200 cases over 3 years and had an overall AI Impact ™ factor of 1.8%. Conclusions: The potential of AI to be a powerful, reliable, and effective diagnostic tool for pathologists is highlighted, while the AI Impact™ in a real-world setting demonstrates the ability of AI to standardize prostate cancer diagnosis at a high level of performance across pathologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.