In one paragraphArticle in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
25 authors.
Abdurrahman Alp TokalıoğluClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-2744 Aysun AlcıClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-7375 Okan OktarClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9696-7886 Mehmet ÜnsalClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-6804 Necim YalçınClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5980-3244 Okan AytekinClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6430-4607 Fatih ÇelikClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9523-180X Gülşah Tiryaki GünerClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4543-1763 Burak ErsakClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3301-062X Fatih KılıçClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7333-4883 Sevgi AyhanClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1697-8583 Serra Akar İnanClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0466-140X Caner ÇakırClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2559-9104 Hakan YalçınClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-1351 Vakkas KorkmazClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8895-6864 Sevgi KoçClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1703-0690 Nurettin BoranClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-5551 Günsu Kimyon CömertClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-4196 Tayfun ToptaşClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6706-6915 Işın ÜreyenClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3491-4682 Osman TürkmenClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-4196 Özlem Moraloğlu TekinClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8167-3837 Fazlı ErdoğanClinic of Pathology, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-2178 Yaprak Engin-ÜstünClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1011-3848 Taner TuranClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8120-1143 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Objective: To determine whether patients with atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (ASC-H) cytology have a correlation between high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) type and CIN 2+ Material and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively, using data from three tertiary gynecologic oncology centers located in various regions of Turkey. Data from 5,271 patients who had colposcopy between January 2003 and January 2021 were analyzed. Results: A total of 163 patients who had ASC-H cervical cytology test results, based on the Bethesda 2014 classification were eligible, and of these 83 (50.9%) who tested positive for HPV were included in the study. There was no correlation between the occurrence of CIN 2+ lesions and age (p=0.053). If there was any HPV 16 positivity (only HPV 16, HPV 16 and 18, HPV 16 and others) the presence of CIN 2+ lesions in the final pathology increased significantly. In HPV 16 positive ASC-H patients, the probability of CIN 2+ lesions in the final pathology were 72.5% while this rate was 48.1% in HPV 16 negative group (p=0.033). Conclusion: The guidelines do not provide a comprehensive definition of the role of the HPV test in managing ASC-H. Positive high-risk HPV types, especially HPV 16, together with an ASC-H smear result should bring to mind the possibility of high-grade dysplasia.
Indexed as
ASC-Hcervical cancerHPV
Identifiers
PMID38868461
PMCPMC11576636
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390