Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868395›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2024

Genesis of People's Medicine Centre (PMC) for popularisation of generic medicine: A critical qualitative inquiry.

Ranjit Kumar Dehury, Imteyaz Ahmad, Manas Ranjan Behera, Varalakshmi Manchana, Parthsarathi Dehury, Deepanjali Behera, Nafisa Vaz E Desouza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ranjit Kumar DehurySchool of Management Studies, University of Hyderabad, Telangana 500 046, India.
Imteyaz AhmadSchool of Management Studies, University of Hyderabad, Telangana 500 046, India.
Manas Ranjan BeheraSchool of Public Health, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.
Varalakshmi ManchanaSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Telangana 500 046, India.
Parthsarathi DehurySchool of Public Health, Asian Institute of Public Health University, Bhubaneswar, India.
Deepanjali BeheraSchool of Public Health, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.
Nafisa Vaz E DesouzaGoa Institute of Management Panaji, Goa, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The concerns of inaccessibility to essential medicines in India are well-studied and documented. Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Priyojana (PMBJP) is one of the policy initiatives to address the inaccessibility of essential medicine. Janaushadhi Kendra (People's Medicine Centre), which is part of PMBJP is being enquired in a limited way to understand its effectiveness. The province of Odisha has been chosen as the study area for the evaluation of People's Medicine Centres. Objective: The present study intends to inquire into the nature of People's Medicine Centre ownership, pharmacists' motivations and incentives to engage in business, perceived customers' trust and satisfaction, scheme beneficiaries, and challenges. Methods: A qualitative research approach has been adopted to evaluate the broader subjective accounts of the pharmacists and People's Medicine Centre. An open-ended interview guide was used. The topics of ownership, motivation, incentives, trust, satisfaction, perceived benefits, and challenges has been recorded from the participants. A total of seventeen in-depth interviews were conducted in the province of Odisha, India. Results: The study found that the ownership of People's Medicine Centre was of two types in the province of Odisha: public-NGO-owned People's Medicine Centres and public-private-owned People's Medicine Centres. The financial incentive provisions in the scheme attracted the private pharmacists. Pharmacists highlighted about the lower price of generic medicines compared to branded medicines, which is very popular among patients. They also pointed out that there is no difference in the efficacy of both medicines. The attitude of physicians, especially private physicians, were considered problematic for popularity and acceptance. Conclusion: The People's Medicine Centres in Odisha established themselves as trusted outlets despite physicians' unfavourable attitudes. Although the centres have not reached the required geographical coverage, economically developed regions have large number of centres, while backward regions have minimal presence. The scheme needs to be more conducive to the welfare of the masses living in remote and rural areas.

Indexed as

EntrepreneurshipHealth policyJanaushadhi KendraLow-cost medicinesPMBJPUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID38868395
PMCPMC11167389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.