Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868306›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Syndromic Gastrointestinal Panel Diagnostic Tests Have Changed our Understanding of the Epidemiology of

Logan C Ray, Daniel C Payne, Joshua Rounds, Rosalie T Trevejo, Elisha Wilson, Kari Burzlaff, Katie N Garman, Sarah Lathrop, Tamara Rissman, Katie Wymore and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A pseudo-outbreak ofAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  8. Specialty grand challenge in gastrointestinal infections.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Logan C RayDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3456-152X
Daniel C PayneDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joshua RoundsMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Rosalie T TrevejoOregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Elisha WilsonColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Kari BurzlaffNew York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Katie N GarmanTennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Sarah LathropNew Mexico Emerging Infections Program, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Tamara RissmanConnecticut Emerging Infections Program, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Katie WymoreCalifornia Department of Public Health, Oakland, California, USA.
Sophia WoznyMaryland Department of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Siri WilsonGeorgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Louise K Francois WatkinsDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Beau B BruceDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Daniel L WellerDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the US, yersinosis was understood to predominantly occur in winter and among Black or African American infants and Asian children. Increased use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) has led to marked increases in yersinosis diagnoses. Methods: We describe differences in the epidemiology of yersiniosis diagnosed by CIDT versus culture in 10 US sites, and identify determinants of health associated with diagnostic method. Results: Annual reported incidence increased from 0.3/100 000 in 2010 to 1.3/100 000 in 2021, particularly among adults ≥18 years, regardless of race and ethnicity, and during summer months. The proportion of CIDT-diagnosed infections increased from 3% in 2012 to 89% in 2021. An ill person's demographic characteristics and location of residence had a significant impact on their odds of being diagnosed by CIDT. Conclusions: Improved detection due to increased CIDT use has altered our understanding of yersinosis epidemiology, however differential access to CIDTs may still affect our understanding of yersinosis.

Indexed as

culture-independent diagnostic testsFoodborne Diseases Active Surveillance NetworkFoodNetsyndromic gastrointestinal panel testsYersinia enterocolitica

Identifiers

PMID38868306
PMCPMC11167669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.