Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38868292›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Understanding and Managing Metabolic Deficiencies Post Bariatric and Esophagectomy Surgeries: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Mina Daniel, Renad Al Dhib, Moises Mendoza, Saima N Tisekar, Ananya Reddy Cingireddy, Binish Essani, Ruchi Mahashabde, Sai Aditya Maddineni, Maria Kamel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mina DanielInternal Medicine, Memorial Hermann Health System, Houston, USA.
Renad Al DhibGeneral Surgery, Mahsa University, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Moises MendozaInternal Medicine, Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado (UCLA), Barquisimeto, VEN.
Saima N TisekarInternal Medicine, University of Perpetual Help System DALTA, Las Piñas, PHL.
Ananya Reddy CingireddyInternal Medicine, MountainView Regional Medical Center, Las Cruces, USA.
Binish EssaniInternal Medicine, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK.
Ruchi MahashabdeGeneral Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, IND.
Sai Aditya MaddineniGeneral Surgery, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW.
Maria KamelMedicine, Columbus Central University School of Medicine, Ladyville, BLZ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrectomy and esophagectomy are the most performed surgeries in the treatment of both esophageal and gastric cancers. The type of esophagectomy depends on the type of malignancy, site of the tumor, criteria of resection, and field of resection. The three standard approaches to esophagectomy are the transhiatal approach, the left thoracoabdominal approach, and a three-stage procedure. The transhiatal approach involves abdominal and cervical incisions, while the left thoracoabdominal approach is a one-stage procedure that utilizes a single incision exposing the dissection field. The Ivor Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies are two-stage and three-stage surgeries that include laparotomy with right thoracotomy. Malabsorption often emerges as a significant postoperative complication following esophagectomy and gastrectomy surgeries. Malnutrition linked with these cancers has detrimental effects, including heightened rates of postoperative complications, elevated infection risks, delayed wound healing, reduced tolerance to treatment, diminished quality of life, and heightened mortality rates. Our narrative review summarizes and sheds light on solutions to treat malabsorption disorders and malnutrition after gastric bypass surgery. These solutions include methods such as adjustments, supplements, and treatment. Although more research is needed to confirm their effectiveness, these methods indicate potential for lowering the impact on patients' diets. By considering the beneficial implications of these effects and considering solutions, we aim to improve the management of these adverse effects, ultimately improving the overall health and postoperative outcomes of patients.

Indexed as

bariatric surgeryesophageal cancer (ec)esophagectomymalabsorptionmalnutrition riskmicronutrient deficienciespost-bariatric surgeryprimary gastric carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38868292
PMCPMC11168022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.